News & Press: Affiliates in the News

Mandi Ross & John Patzakis: Search Terms: Tried and True, Now Even Better

Wednesday, June 3, 2020   (0 Comments)
Share |

PrismLit Home – Prism Litigation Technology

Extract from Mandi Ross & John Patzakis' article "Search Terms: Tried and True, Now Even Better"

A key Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provision that greatly impacts eDiscovery processes is Rule 26(f), which requires the parties’ counsel to “meet and confer” in advance of the pre-trial scheduling conference on key discovery matters, including the preservation, disclosure and exchange of potentially relevant electronically stored information (ESI). With the risks and costs associated with eDiscovery, this early meeting of counsel is a critically important means to manage and control the cost of eDiscovery, and to ensure relevant ESI is preserved.

A very good authority on the Rule 26(f) eDiscovery conference is the “Suggested Protocol for Discovery of Electronically Stored Information,” provided by then Magistrate Judge Paul W. Grimm and his joint bar-court committee. Under Section 8 of the Model Protocol, the topics to be discussed at the Rule 26(f) conference include: “Search methodologies for retrieving or reviewing ESI such as identification of the systems to be searched;” “the use of key word searches, with an agreement on the words or terms to be searched;” “limitations on the time frame of ESI to be searched;” and “limitations on the fields or document types to be searched.”

Read more here


What our customers say?

©2018 Association of Certified E-Discovery Specialists
All Rights Reserved