Extract from H. Christopher Boehning and Daniel J. Toal's article "Third Circuit Grants New Trial To Allow E-Discovery Expert Testimony"
Three years ago, we wrote about GN Netcom v. Plantronics, a federal district court case notable for imposing severe sanctions on a company under then-recently enacted Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(e) for an executive’s intentional spoliation of evidence. Recently, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit issued a decision in the case that is notable for a different reason. The Third Circuit remanded the case for a new trial solely on the basis of the District Court’s decision to exclude an expert’s trial testimony on the extent of the defendant’s e-discovery misconduct and spoliation. This case demonstrates the true impact and value that experts can have not only in discovery, but also on the potential outcome of the matter itself.
I wanted a certification that separates me from my peers. Upon discovering CEDS, I was convinced this was exactly the type of distinction I had been seeking. Since achieving CEDS certification, I’ve noticed immediate recognition from my organization, colleagues, and current and prospective clients.They acknowledge they are more comfortable working with a person who has taken time to seek such certification. CEDS has certainly been worth the small investment and should continue to beget returns for years and years to come.
Andrew Bayer, CEDS
I get bombarded with all kinds of e-discovery stuff – news, blogs and whatnot. Let me tell you, you guys send the absolute best! I send it to all my partners and sales folks. I said, who are these guys? I have to get to know them better!
Kevin Glass, CEO
As a trial lawyer, day-to-day information processing is daunting for my client service. I’ve come to rely on ACEDS to keep me on the ‘edge’ of the curve on e-discovery. It’s a source I ‘ping’ ASAP.