Extract from Helen Geib's article "Ask the Right Questions: eDiscovery Identification Part 2"
Effective identification of relevant ESI is the foundation of a successful eDiscovery project. Identification generally follows a five step process: learn about the case; learn about the client’s IT systems; build a detailed data map; follow up on technical and other issues; and document the project. Part one of this series was an overview of the purpose, process and practical considerations of identification. In parts two and three, I offer a detailed review of the five steps.
Step 1: Learn about the case When a new case comes in, a litigator’s first order of business is to learn what it’s about. What are the legal issues, the factual background, the key players and the relevant timeframe?
Add “what are the main sources of ESI” and the first step of identification dovetails neatly with this line of questions. Litigators who don’t feel comfortable talking about ESI with the client should partner with a more technology-minded lawyer or seek consulting support from their eDiscovery or forensics service provider.
I wanted a certification that separates me from my peers. Upon discovering CEDS, I was convinced this was exactly the type of distinction I had been seeking. Since achieving CEDS certification, I’ve noticed immediate recognition from my organization, colleagues, and current and prospective clients.They acknowledge they are more comfortable working with a person who has taken time to seek such certification. CEDS has certainly been worth the small investment and should continue to beget returns for years and years to come.
Andrew Bayer, CEDS
I get bombarded with all kinds of e-discovery stuff – news, blogs and whatnot. Let me tell you, you guys send the absolute best! I send it to all my partners and sales folks. I said, who are these guys? I have to get to know them better!
Kevin Glass, CEO
As a trial lawyer, day-to-day information processing is daunting for my client service. I’ve come to rely on ACEDS to keep me on the ‘edge’ of the curve on e-discovery. It’s a source I ‘ping’ ASAP.