News & Press: Industry News

Malpractice Claim re: Preservation Oversight Survives Summary Judgment

Thursday, March 29, 2018   (0 Comments)
Share |

Extract from Tushar Vaidya's article "Failure to Adequately Advise Clients on Their Preservation Obligations Can Be Considered Malpractice" 

 By now, most litigators should know that they have an affirmative duty to advise their clients about the duty to preserve potentially relevant documents.  Despite this, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York recently denied an attorney defendant’s motion for summary judgment in part because the record was not clear as to whether the attorney defendant fulfilled its obligations with respect to the duty to preserve.

Industrial Quick Search, Inc., Michael Meiresonne, and Meiresonne & Associates (collectively “Plaintiffs”) sued their law firm Miller, Rosado & Alogis, LLP (“Defendants”) for malpractice.  Neil Miller and Chris Rosado, named partners of the firm, were also individually named as Defendants.  Defendants represented Plaintiffs in an underlying copyright infringement lawsuit in which default judgement was entered against Plaintiffs for misappropriating confidential information, plagiarizing copyrighted material, and for deliberately destroying potentially relevant documents.

Read the full article here


What our customers say?

©2018 Association of Certified E-Discovery Specialists
All Rights Reserved