How would you rate your understanding of technology-assisted review? There is simply no easier or more effective way to reduce the time and cost of a document review – and yet there is still confusion about how to leverage TAR in litigation.
This one-hour program will walk you through everything you need to know to be able to effectively employ TAR in litigation. Learn from industry experts as they take you from the first meet and confer, through the negotiation of search terms and an acceptable ESI protocol, to prioritized review and ultimate validation.
Our speakers will focus on the tools you need to manage opposing counsel, the Court, and the technology. All registrants will receive links to the recording and slide deck.
Robin E. Stewart
Kutak Rock LLP
Robin is the founder and chair of Kutak Rock’s eDiscovery Practice Group and a member of the firm’s commercial litigation practice. From her days litigating tobacco, pharmaceutical and medical device products cases when eDiscovery was still in its infancy, to her stewardship of Kutak Rock’s eDiscovery Practice, Robin has pioneered the development of efficient, practical and effective approaches to address the explosion of electronically stored information’s use in modern litigation. Today, Robin is recognized by her peers, judges, competitor firms, service professionals and think tanks as a global expert on e-discovery, digital evidence and attendant issues.
Thomas C. Gricks III
Director, Data Analytics
A prominent e-discovery lawyer and a leading authority on the use of TAR, Tom is a director of data analytics, at OpenText. He advises corporations and law firms on best practices for applying technology to reduce the time and cost of discovery and investigations. Tom has more than 25 years’ experience as a trial lawyer and in-house counsel, most recently with the law firm Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis, where he was a partner and chair of the E-Discovery Practice Group. He was lead e-discovery counsel in Global Aerospace v. Landow Aviation, the first case in the country to authorize the use of TAR over the objection of opposing counsel.